Russia's Counter-Reformation
Aleksandr Podrabinek knows a creeping police state when he sees one. As a Soviet-era dissident he was a member of the Moscow Helsinki Group human rig...
Aleksandr Podrabinek knows a creeping police state when he sees one. As a Soviet-era dissident he was a member of the Moscow Helsinki Group human rig...
It is worth trying to determine precisely what Bush means when he asks us to take a more historical perspective on his presidency.
2009 could be the year when America and Russia decide to make dramatic reductions in nuclear weapons and convene an international conference of all nuclear nations to agree to the complete elimination of nuclear weapons from the face of the earth.
The Euro-presidency is admittedly a largely ceremonial job, and what can be accomplished in just six months is fairly limited. So why then should Americans care?
There are increasing hints of dissent even within the ranks of the establishment that further demonstrate how thin the support for Putinism in Russia may be.
Instead of increasing the investment of average people in the stability of the system by, say, making elections fairer and more frequent, the Kremlin is moving in the opposite direction.
The proud towers of Wall Street have fallen, disgorging packs of thieves and fraudsters. The mighty US suddenly exposed as the proverbial king without clothes. Uncle Sam is bankrupt.
Russia today turned off the gas to Ukraine for the second time in three years. They are not providing gas despite Ukraine's full payment for all gas received from Russia in 2008.
What unfolds is episodic and at times a bit long, but a good deal of the sequences are quite original, some very funny, most important extremely intriguing, much of which holds our attention.
Sunday I talked with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the elder statesman and national security advisor to Jimmy Carter, about the Russian invasion of Georgia. He long tangled with Soviet power. Now he takes on Putin.
It's worth noting that the main studies for both the Challenger and the Columbia 17 years later focused on the NASA decision-making culture as the ultimate culprit.
American evangelicals invaded Russia with missionaries, said the Orthodox aren't "real Christians," and attacked their friends. Now we expect Russia to be logical about these matters and do what is good for business.
It's only natural that after our most recent 12-month carnival, 2007 would seem relatively blah. Every now and then, history lays an egg. What happened in 1957? 1910? 1887-1897?
Special for the Huffington Post Eric S. Margolis November 12, 2008 As Americans observed Veteran's Day, and other Western nations commemorated the 10...
I can now parse routing diagrams so complex that I would never have paid attention to them in the past. Now I rely on them to set up comm links.
Perhaps the turmoil within the ruling elite during the 2007-08 transition, which seemed quite smoothly managed from the outside, was more discomfiting to the Kremlin than we previously thought.
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
This is why energy independence is needed. Wind, solar, natural gas...good clean energy. Get the technology and let's get going!
Here in Louisiana we have plenty, it's such a shame we don't have a pipeline running there to help out.
Hey , pay attention America .. ENERGY INDEPENDENCE.... Drill Here Drill now , Hydro , solar Nukes , Coal ( clean and yes it can be done) wind ( even if Kennedy and Kerry don't want in their backyard..... A combination not elimination... Fossil Fuels are are not evil incarnate.
Want it in YOUR backyard?
Want to go without heat this winter?
Ukraine got a good deal at $250--much cheaper than any other country in Europe (except maybe Belorus, which is all but officially part of Russia again). Yushchenko's strategy has been to rail against Russia while asking for a handout. Russia may end up taking a lot of heat for this, and I'm not sure the strategy is sound, but Ukraine has been in violation of agreements and has been stealing gas. I don't know why these leaders (Georgia, Ukraine) purposely provoke Russia--it's a stupid strategy. The US and EU provoked Russia too--nobody has benefited from these provocations.
Responding to intermediary theft by dropping supplies by like amount MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.
There is NO rational way one concludes that's a response to anything. First off, if anyone was being stolen from it would be the Europeans who were the victems. Secondly, it should be easy enough to monitor the actual situation - the Europeans should monitor the gas flow and decide for themselves.
However, what this really shows is that Russia is not a reliable partner. Europe should wean itself off Russian gas IMMEDIATELY and NEVER go back to them again. With no market, that would show Russia... Since Europe already has 80% supplied elsewhere, it can perhaps trim 20% in a go-green campaign anyway...
.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in